Fifth pharmaceutical company indicted in ongoing criminal investigations* Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., U.S., has been charged with conspiracy to fix the price of generic drugs, the Department of Justice announced today. The charge filed today in the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia (…) A fixed price agreement is a mutually binding contract that aims to set your energy prices in each port of your choice, regardless of future market movements. Competition law prohibits almost all attempts by competitors to determine prices with their competitors. You can`t: Horizontal pricing: this is among the competitors of a particular product. It was executed the best known by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries. Although countries set oil prices, they are public and non-commercial entities. This makes them beyond the reach of U.S. antitrust laws, according to a 1979 U.S. District Court decision. Pricing is when two companies, usually companies, agree to sell a product at a set price.
They do it to get the profit margins. For monopolies, the simplest thing is to set prices. They work without competitors who could offer products at lower prices. Freezing or lowering prices: Governments set prices by setting price reductions. In the 1970s, inflation threatened to destroy consumer confidence in the economy itself. The government set prices to stop inflation and restore confidence. It is a very clumsy instrument and is only used if monetary policy has proved ineffective. While competition law has not accepted these arguments, a number of lawmakers and public and local regulators have put in place systems that allow, for example, competing healthcare providers to seek permission to set their prices under close state supervision in order to subsidize low-cost care for the poor. These systems protect suppliers from lawsuits by extending state immunity from antitrust enforcement to their private acts. Pricing between different firms can, to some extent, influence consumer choices and affect small businesses that depend on these suppliers.
 Economists generally agree that horizontal price agreements are bad for consumers. Competition usually lowers prices, as competitors try to attract each other`s customers. In a competitive market, therefore, the consumer realizes the greatest possible amount of surplus for consumers – the value of the good for the consumer, which goes beyond what the consumer actually has to pay. Price-fixing agreements, which reduce the ability of competitors to react freely and quickly to each other`s prices, reduce consumer surplus by affecting the competitive market`s ability to keep prices low. . . .